In general, all 3 of our users found the prototypes to be very straightforward and had no issue in figuring out where the filters were on the home screen and restaurant menu and how to correctly use them, as well as how to exclude certain items during the food selection process. 

​

For Prototype A, ⅔ users enjoyed the icons next to the food items that allowed them to get an overview of what different foods had; ⅔ users also enjoyed the pop-up menu since that helped them know they were on the same screen. For Prototype B, a feature that was universally liked by all users was the way in which the filtering screen was presented with the picture icons as it provided users a visual representation of the allergen/dietary restriction as well as allowed for text on a bigger screen. However, 1 user did enjoy the checkbox way of filtering instead.

​

While the filtering process was generally very straightforward and most users could navigate it, all of the users we talked to did find the process to be a little repetitive due to how they have to filter through each part of the process from the home screen, restaurant menu, and food selection in both prototypes. One thing that one user found confusing in Prototype A was the sugar slider as it indicated low-high sugar level, and they felt that it didn’t accurately represent what the sugar slider would be for, and also that it had a negative connotation with ‘high’ sugar. On the other hand, one thing that another user found confusing in Prototype B was the similarity between screens 2 and 4, which made them feel like they were filtering the same section again, but it was for a different part of the process. Overall, all users preferred Protype B because it was more consistent with Doordash and they liked the pictures associated with the different food restrictions. However, many users also suggested implementing different features from Prototype A like the icons and pop up menu to blend into Prototype B.